ABSOLUTE AGE OF ROCK essays

ABSOLUTE AGE OF ROCK essays ROCKS ARE AN INTERESTING BUT MYSTERIOS THINGS BECAUSE, THERE ARE ALL KINDS OF ROCKS AND WAYS THEY CAN BE FORMED AND HOW THERE FORMED. THE MEANING ABSOLUTE AGE OF ROCK IS HOW OLD A CERTAIN ROCK IS, AND KNOW THAT ME CAN FIND OUT HOW OLD THE EARTH IS IN YEARS, MONTHS OR DAYS. CARBON 14 IS AN ELEMENT FOUND IN A ONCE LIVING THING, AND IT IS USED ONORGANIC MATERIAL LESS THAN 50,000 YEARS OLD, WHICH INCLUDES MANY THINGS SUCH AS HUMAN REMAINS AND ARTIFACTS, BUT EXCLUDES MOST FOSSILS ABSOLUTE DATING COMPLEMENTS RELATIVE DATING BY PROVIDING AN EXACT OR ABSOLUTE AGE FOR AN OBJECT, SUCH AS 50 MILLION YEARS BEFORE PRESENT, IN YEARS BEFORE RELIABLE FORMS OF ABSOLUTE DATING BECAME BECAME AVAILABLE THROUGH THE FOUNDING OF RADIOMETRIC DATING METHODS. THESE METHODS ARE BASED ON THE KNOWN, REGULAR DECAY OF CERTAIN REDIOACTIVE ELEMENTSITTO OTHER ISOTOPES OR DAUGHTER PRODUCTS THE WAY IT WORKS IS, BY MEASURING THE PARENT AND DAUGHTER PRODUCT IN A ROCK SAMPLE, ITS EXACT AGE CAN BE CALCULATED. RADIOACTIVE DECAY IS WHEN MOST ELEMENTS COMPRISE MORE THAN ONE ISOTOP. SOME ARE STABE AND HAVE BEEN ARUND SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM BUT OTHERS ARE UNSTABLE AND BRAEK DOWN BY RADIOACTIVE DECAY OF THEIR NUCLEI TO ANOTHER ISOTOPES, USUALLY OF OTHER ELEMENTS. I FOUND THIS TOPPIC ON ABSOLUTE AGE OF ROCK VERY EXITING TO DO AND I ENJOYED IT I LEARNED ALOTE OF INFORMATION SUCH AS HOW TO MEASURE HOW OLD A ROCK IS OR THE EARTH IS, SO I HOPE YOU LIKE THIS PAPER. 1) HTTP://MEMBERS.AOL.COM/FORSTRACK/FOSSDATE.HTM 2) HTTP://WWW.ESCI.KEELE.AC.UK/COURSES/GEOL103ECT13B.HTM LEES GRAHAM 2000 WEB PAGE DATED 3) HTTP://WWW.ES-DESIGNS.COM/GEOL105/LECTURE06.HTML NO NAME AND PAGE DATED IN 2000 ...

Static And Dynamic Characters In Great Expectation Essays

Static And Dynamic Characters In Great Expectation Essays Static And Dynamic Characters In Great Expectations Static and Dynamic Characters in Great Expectations Joe is a very simple name. So, in relation to that, Joe in Great Expectations is a simple, good and moral character. Joe does not change at all in the book. He begins the book showing his good nature and generosity when, after supposedly being robbed by the convict, he was happy that the convict did not starve. And in the middle of the book, after all Pip had done to him after he became a gentleman, Joe was still loving and affectionate towards him when he became ill. Also, throughout the book, Joe was proud to be who he was. He never wanted any property or money. Even when Mr. Jaggers offered him money because he would not have Pip as his apprentice anymore, he did not accept it. In contrast, Estella is a very dynamic character; she goes from being a girl with a heart of ice to a sensitive woman, although the change in her takes place late in the book. At the start of the book Estella is very mean and insulting to Pip. This is not her own nature, and that is why it is possible for her to change into a better person. Estella was brought up by Miss Havisham to crush the hearts of all men, so that is what she does to Pip. Since Miss Havisham is the only family Estella has ever known, she is bound to her. Since she is bound to Miss Havisham, she is obligated to serve as her tool of vengeance. But, when Miss Havisham dies, that bond is gone and more of Estellas true nature can come out. Since Estella is, at heart, a well-meaning person, she does soften up. This occurs after she has experienced hard times as Bentley Drummles wife, wich forces her to convert, and her cruel personality is finally destroyed by her true nature. At the end of the book Pip realizes that she has changed and thinks: ...what I had never seen before, was the saddened softened light of the once proud eyes; what I had never felt before, was the friendly touch of the once insensible hand. (Chapter 59).

Case Study 7 - Tsutomu Shimomura Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Case Study 7 - Tsutomu Shimomura - Assignment Example 2. Tsumoto felt that computer security could only be served while being on the path of the â€Å"White hat† rather than be at the dark side which Mitnick eventually was. Being on this path also allowed Tsumoto to get law enforcements help to take out the hacker which he would have not no matter how much successful he would have been in tracking the hacker. 3. I believe that Mitnick would not have been caught if Tsumoto didn’t get involved. Law enforcement were in a disadvantage as far as having the technical knowledge of tracking a hacker in concerned and only Tsumoto was in a perfect position to track the hacker, thus Tsumoto started the hunt for Mitnick which ultimately led to his arrest (Notable hackers - Securelist). 4. I believe that it’s rare to be a professional hacker and yet stay on the right side of the law. Lust for money, greed eventually lead many of the professional hackers to go in the path of dark side and thus eventually against the law. Too much professional pride, over confidence also results in going on the wrong path of the

The Sales Plan for Ontela PicDeck Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

The Sales Plan for Ontela PicDeck - Essay Example Consumers also reflected increased affinity of sending photos through the use of electronic mails and also storing photos on the in the effective desktop which is enabled through the use of the PicDeck service. The major competitors for Ontela PicDeck can be evaluated to be like Eye-Fi and Transcend that offer technology solutions relating to data transfer in a wireless medium and also in the storage of the same in memory cards. It is observed that wireless technology companies like Eye-Fi and Transcend enable the collection of a large number of photos and thereby contribute in transferring the same to other devices based on the wireless medium and also through the use of the cloud interface. Eye-Fi and Transcend have viewed as the significant players in the wireless market ineffective transfers of a large number of photos from cameras to Smartphones and also from mobile devices to computers. It is observed that where Transcend tends to generate a 32 GB Wi-Fi card for around $72.45; Eye-Fi tends to generate a 16 GB Wi-Fi card for around $89.74. In terms of price and storage features, Transcend tends to be the most appealing product let alone the performance and technology competence of Eye- Fi. Technology offered by such companies contributes in effectively sharing the contents between the mobile phones and laptops and personal computers such that the same can be further shared through the use of electronic mails and social platforms like Facebook (Perlman 2013).  

Cadbury Chocolate Company Marketing Strategy Research Paper

Cadbury Chocolate Company Marketing Strategy - Research Paper Example A specification and assessment of the Cadbury Chocolate’s current marketing strategyA specification and assessment of the Cadbury Chocolate’s current marketing strategy In order to amplify the position and reputation in the market, the organization of Cadbury Chocolate tried to implement effective marketing strategies. Only then, the organization of Cadbury Chocolate might enhance its brand image and range of customers to a significant extent as compared to many other rival players.  Effective distribution system: the organization of Cadbury tried to maintain effective distribution system so that the customers might get their desired products. However, this strategy of Cadbury Chocolate became successful only due to the effective team management and work coordination of the sale team members that amplified the productivity and market share of the organization of Cadbury Chocolate in the market.Customer choice and preferences: the organization of Cadbury Chocolate beca me successful in understanding the demands and requirements of the customers and acted in that way. It prepared varied types of chocolates such as gems, diary milk, perk, 5 stars, à ©clairs that enhanced the profitability and demand of the products of Cadbury Chocolate. Moreover, constant modification of the products so as to fulfill the preferences of the target customers amplified its growth by almost 35 percent within a very small period of time. Due to which, it helped the organization to position itself as a market leader.

Utilitarianism and Business Ethics

Utilitarianism and Business Ethics Deception, greed, and extreme pressure led to the demise of Enron (Beenen and Pinto, 2009). Employees need the ability to disengage ethical issues from these complications of self-interest and provide clear definition; employees need to distinguish between negligible issues typical of work life and critical issues that threaten a companys ethical environment. Ethical issues come with temptations and threats. By understanding threats to personnel interests, alternatives will arise to implement correction. Going along with the crowd can endorse immediate career interests whereas resiting can put status, career and family well-being at risk. By accepting ethical theory, this can act as a guideline for a human resource (HR) manager to identify and handle the issues of self-interest. DeGeorge (2010) defines utilitarianism as an act of moral significance established by its involvement to create the most amount of good for the most number of people. This is based on the ability to foresee the consequences of an action as the choice that succumbs to the greatest benefit, to the majority of people, is the choice that is ethically correct. Beenen and Pinto (2009) identify that corrupt organisations, such as Enron, act unethically by decisions, that are usually, made by a group of senior employees to benefit the organisation. Decisions made by Jeff Skilling (senior manager) to cook the accounting books may have been, in his opinion, as an ethically correct way to benefit the shareholders and stakeholders, by portraying a strong financial image. However, the consequences of this action didnt create the most amount of good for the most amount of people. Instead self-interest influenced unethical behaviour by means of greed and pressure from Wall Street to benefit, not the organisation as a whole but, Jeff Skilling and management, personally, for financial gain. Rational self-interest is good however greed is eventually detrimental (DeGeorge, 2010). While the theory of utilitarianism will always argue to benefit the majority, it can also neglect the minority (DeGeorge, 2010). Sherron Watkins ability to make judgment that Enrons accounting standards were immoral created a rule utilitarianism approach with regards to the law and the concern with fairness; seeking to benefit the majority of people. Therefore, added benefits of rule utilitarianism values justice and includes beneficence at the same time. In the eyes of a HR manager, by taking action the majority of the stakeholders would benefit from a moral organisation adhering to their code of conduct, conducting fairness in all of their business activities. However, an issue with this decision, while sherron was commended for doing the right thing, showed that her actions to neglect the corrupt senior management team (minority) for the stakeholders (majority) for a more ethical workplace started to inflicted damage to the entire business. Cable, News, Network (CNN) (2002) stated that Enron filed for liquidation, people lost their jobs, some committed suicide and many were jobless. Sherron may have been trying to do the right (and difficult) thing but it may not have been the best way to get ahead. Her self-interest was going to become a consequence for the majority and she was unable to predict the future so as to see how her decisions would affect people later on. A HR manager needs to take into consideration that there is no wa y of telling exactly what the costs of our behaviour will be, we just do what we think is right at that specific time (DeGeorge, 2010). After examining DeGeorge (2010) a utilitarian approach to this case study in handling self-interest is too impractical. This is because the practical application of the theory requires the ability to predict the long-term consequences of an action and, to predict those consequences with unfailing accuracy; past experience can, to some extent, guide future experience. However, there is never any guarantee that circumstances will turn out exactly the same (DeGeorge, 2010). This uncertainty can create unexpected results making the utilitarian approach look unethical, as the time the choice was made didnt benefit the majority for the greater good. A HR manager needs to identify that the flaw in utilitarianism theory has no consideration for the minority; however, kantian theory suggests that it doesnt neglect this issue i.e. allowing the minority to suffer for the benefit of the majority. According to DeGeorge (2010) Kants deontology theory is supported by the actions of an individual under consideration. A collective approach to an action suggests it can determine whether an action is moral as it allows one to portray the result of everyone universally contributing to this action. Immanuel Kants theory (DeGeorge, 2010) suggests that an individual must have the freedom to truly act in a moral way. In the case study, some employees understand the company is behaving unethically i.e. dodgy account standards for personal gain. A HR manager could identify that these people have a choice to voice their concern, leave the company or go along with the crowd; however self-interest and the ability to be disciplined may pose a threat to take any action. These people have physiological needs to support family and a moral decision to voice their concerns, in this respect, could pose an issue. By being immoral or turning a blind eye, to the situation, could be the easiest option. Employees do have a choice and the freedom to make a moral decision however self-interest can sometimes turn a moral idea into an immoral decision; without the discipline there is no freedom (Wood, 2008). A deeper analysis of Kants theory suggests that the concept of ethics is not based on desires or circumstances. Moral law is a definite necessity because it has no precursor; there is no but part in the command (DeGeorge, 2010). Sherron Watkins provided an example of how this theory works. Sherron adhered to Enrons ethical code of conduct when analysing the ethical dilemma of accounting irregularities that were present. By identifying this problem to her manager, Ken Lay, she fulfilled her obligations of responsibility. Upholding ones duty is whats considered ethically correct (Wood, 2008). Sherron had found the morality through rationale of her mind as she was not influenced by feelings (preference), but instead she was concerned with fixed statements of duty (I mustà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦). The theory suggests that an individual has no flexibility and no chance to consider ones own position (DeGeorge, 2010). Naturally, people seem to acknowledge that certain rules must have rational exceptions. For instance, with regards to Ken Lay his decision not to fire Sherron Watkins could have jeopardised Andy Fastows position and the companies indicating individuals may need to lie to protect others. So, could a HR manager be reasonable to assume that the same rules can be applied consistently in different circumstances? This makes Kantian ethics rigid because the consequence of an action is not necessarily separated from the action itself (DeGeorge, 2010). Unlike utilitarianism this theory is not based on social utility. It avoids the utilitarian flaw of allowing the minority to suffer for the benefit of the majority, based on free choice and similar to that of John Rawls theory of justice. As described by DeGeorge (2010) the egalitarian, John Rawls, devised a theoretical model that proposed an individual who, covered in a veil of ignorance, would recommend a just society without any understanding of their status in society. The individual would choose a system of justice that sufficiently provided for the lower end of society because the individual could end up being in that lower position so, avoids it by being just and fair. Enron executives paid above market bonuses and salaries, they awarded unethical behaviour and punished good behaviour. In a sense many employees would have tried to do the right thing i.e. perform what was asked of them in their relevant job role. While most of these activities were contributing to the overall unethical behaviour, an employee would reasonably obtain their wage and bonus if they performed in a satisfactory or above expected manner. Self-interest presents an underlying problem here. While the pay system of any organisation should be fair and just, greed and extreme pressure to perform presented self-interest drivers that awarded immoral behaviour. Rawls argued that regimented societies are uncommon due to the fact that what is just and unjust is usually in dispute (Rawls, 2003) Robert Nozicks libertarian theory of ethics is similar to Rawls in that they both believe utilitarianism is a flawed theory due to the importance on the consequences of policies and behaviour (Nozick, 1974 Rawls, 2003). Both indicate that since utilitarianism highlights utility or contentment, within society, it cannot justify an explanation of assertions such as assertions of right which people are free to make upon the actions of others. Consequently, each sets out to develop a political theoretical model which sufficiently suggests what Nozick depicts as, the fundamental Kantian principle that individuals are ends and not merely means (DeGeorge, 2010). Nozicks theory suggests that people have the right to possess entitlements such as remuneration as long as it doesnt worsen the position of anyone else (Nozick, 1974). But if these entitlements were obtained unethically, does this worsen the position of anyone else? In one hand people are morally trying to do the right thing but, in the case of Cassandra, they eventually get punished; she moved to another position being seen as a threat. On the other hand people knew their actions were contributing to immoral behaviour as self-interest (greed and pressure) clouded their decision to do what is right. So what are our rights in situations such as the above? The theory of rights can give a HR manager insight into how individuals are protected in an ethically correct way. According to DeGeorge (2010) rights are proposed by society which is protected and is given the uppermost precedence. Since society endorsees rights they are considered to be ethically correct and suitable. DeGeorge (2010) indicates that an individual must interpret what characteristics of rights are in society, as this can pose implications. The underlying issue in the case study is self-interest. Senior management is responsible to ensure that the integrity of the controls in the environment determines the effectiveness of any control system, including remuneration, leave entitlements and job opportunities. With reference to Enrons code of ethics (2000) dignity and mutual respect, for all employees, is a right that the company has promised to respect and uphold. Clearly, this right was not evident in this organisation. Individuals such as Sherron Watkins, Cassandra and Jeff McMahon were not given the right to be treated in a respectful manner as they were moved into different position disguised as promotions. The relevant rights in a business context to freedom of speech were noted by management, as they gave them a chance to express themselves however, this was quickly extinguished. Control systems (rules) may interfere with ones own self interest to succeed or avoid failure; controls are intended for exactly that purpose. Those who would respond to business pressures by evading controls will devise rationales and tactics to justify such an evasion for tactics of disinformation and deception that they may use (Donnelly, 2003). For rights theory to be practical it must be used in combination with another ethical theory, such as ethical relativism, that will consistently outline the objectives of society. Ethical relativism refers to the principle that there are no commonly valid or required moral standards as any two individuals with differences in culture, who have different ethical views, regarding an action, could simultaneously be correct (DeGeorge, 2010). Beenen and Pinto (2009) indicated that Jeff McMahon knew that Enrons accounting practices were unethical while Andy Fastows belief indicated his way was ethically correct i.e. for the greater good of the company. While both ethical views are different they are also both correct. The underlying similarity here indicates that self-interest for personal gain was the main driver relative to their different ethical opinions. DeGeorge (2010) suggests a clear understanding of this theory must be carefully dissected when compared with cultural relativism; as cultural relativism explains the way people actually behave, and ethical relativism recommends how people ought to behave. A HR manager should acknowledge that differences dont imply that there are no commonly valid moral standards. It teaches us that individuals may not always agree on what the principals are or should be. Relativism is a stronger claim as refutation that there are usually suitable moral standards. It is a theoretical claim about the existence of common moral standards, whether or not people believe in them (DeGeorge, 2010). Therefore, it must be verified or unproven by theoretical influences. In summary, ethical theories need to be examined and measured against one another to tackle the issue of self-interest. No one theory on its own is truly valid, rather a collaboration of all theories should be used in order to give a professional (HR manager) the necessary tools to create strategies and examine the likelihood of unethical behaviour. Enron ignored its ethical code of conduct, self-interest (greed and extreme pressure) influenced management in an unethical manner. For ethics to be adhered to companies need to go beyond the notion of simple legal compliance and adopt values based on organisational culture. Ethical reasoning is not natural its a skill that must be learned and practiced.

Personal Growth Experience :: essays research papers

Personal Growth Experience   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  As a mother I have cared and tried to push my son’s education so that he can succeed in his life. I came from a large family in Brazil. I wasn’t the only child; I learned to share, how provide for myself, and for my 3 sisters, and 3 brothers. My father was a serious man; he had a job, and still came home to provide for all of us. During dinnertime he insisted that everyone had to be home and had to sit down at the table and talk about their day. This was a must in my family too. The reason why he had that rule was because he was a religious man, and meals should be shared with the family as well as conversations. No one had any choice of not sitting at the table, unless we didn’t want to eat.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  When I had a child, I waited for the right time to have one. I didn’t want to rush into motherhood responsibility until I had everything in order to support my child. My husband had to find a job, and so did I. We had a house, a car, and jobs to support my child; we were ready. When my child was born, I chose to go to the United States of America, so that my child can have a better life. In Brazil, the education is not challenging, and not recognized in other parts of the world as a higher education. For him to have a better education, a better standard of living, and for him to have what we never had, we had to give up our lives in Brazil. As the years went by I was always there for my son. Through my eyes as he grows older, he is still the little boy that I held in my arms for the first time. In his teenage years I have seen him grow further away from me. Every day when he gets home he goes to his room without talking to me, or saying anything about his da y. I guess that is what all kids go through in these years, because of the stage of exploration of new things in life. Like driving, video games, girls, and puberty. I still love my son, and even if he doesn’t want to talk to me then I guess he has everything in order in his life.